Dec 30, 2009

I'm feel UP from watching Disney/Pixars Up!


So as you can tell from my older review of Wall E, I'm kind of a Pixar fan girl. Now, I'm not so much of a fan girl that I can't accept when Pixar makes some not-as-great-as-usual films (Monsters Inc. and Cars wasn't their best, and when I say that I mean it was good, but it isn't their usual level of awe-inspiring great), but for the most part I have accepted that my heart belongs to Pixar, and that every year, a part of my pay check will go towards supporting their work, be it by buying a movie theater ticket, a DVD copy, or dare I say it, soundtracks and knick knacks from their films. And just when I thought that they couldn't out do themselves due to Wall E's pure awesomeness, they come along with a film that I truly and honestly love, and is what I consider to be the best film this year.

Up is one of those films that is just amazing, in the true sense of the word. It has appeal to almost any audience you can imagine, and has so many layers that I could write a whole paper, or novel, on the gravity that this film has. The animation is stunning, the characters
are developed and lovable, the story is timeless, the dialouge is pitch perfect, and the score fits perfectly with the feel of the movie. This is one of those rare gems that will make you laugh, cry, miss your childhood, look forward to your golden years, and make you step back and see a new perspective on life. And all of this from an animated movie about a house floating away on balloons. Well that, and so much more.

When I first heard reviews flooding in from last years Fantastic Fest that within its first ten minutes, Up had audiences sobbing, I was skeptical. I like to think that I'm one of those stone hearted cynics that, when it comes to movies, you have to do a lot to make me care, and do even more to make me cry. So I was surprised when I found myself bawling during the opening montage that portrays the marriage and lives of Carl and Ellie Fredricksen. This single montage is one of the most moving, emotional, beautiful things that I have ever seen portrayed on film, and that sequence alone deserves every award out there to give, and should be seen by everyone at least once in their lives. I honestly have a hard time putting into words how amazing this part of the movie is.

The plot is as follows: af
ter the death of Carl Fredricksen's wife Ellie (aka the love of his life) he has been living a grouchy, hermit lifestyle in solitude, alone in his beloved house. When face with the threat of being kicked out and moved to an old folks home, Carl uses his ex-balloon salesmen skills and riggs up thousands of colorful balloons to his house, in an attempt to fly himself and his house to Paradise Falls, the one place where he and Ellie always wanted to go, but never got to. And thus the adventure ensues from there, introducing characters like Russel, the lovable little kid that unintentionally joins Carl on his adventure, Dug, the talking dog and Kevin, a colorful tropical bird.

Now with that last sentence I know what you're thinking: talking dogs? Great. But please bear with me, these aren't your usual Disney like talking dogs. These dogs use dialouge that actual dogs would use if they could talk, not some smart-alecky sarcastic quips made up by a writer. I may not be making a lot of sense here, but trust me, the talking dog thing isn't a comic relief shtick and it never gets annoying or juvenile.

Which brings up yet another great thing about this film: the movie isn't juvenile. This movie refuses to talk down to kids, and uses a very grown up story in a kid friendly medium (animation) to teach kids (and adults, teenagers, and seniors alike) a very important lesson about life and love. I don't want to ruin what it is by saying it, but its something that can be lost on some people in this day and age.

The characters as I mentioned before are fantastic, and you'd be hard pressed to find a person that didn't instantly identify and fall in love with them. Carl is your jaded, old neighbor with a heart of gold that loves a lot, Russel is you when you were a kid: over active, loud, energetic and has a soft spot for animals and the wilderness. Dug is the outsider of his group who can't seem to do anything right or fit in, but eventually finds his place. Ellie is that person who walked into your life and changed everything, the loud adventurous person that made you come out of your shell...the list goes on and on, but as I mentioned before, all of them are lovable, relatable, and above all else are developed so well and have so many layers to them that they seem realistic and will win you over.

The animation in this film is your regular Pixar grade quality stuff, meaning that it yet again impresses and looks gorgeous. The sequence of thousands of balloons exploding from Carl's house is a triumph in this medium: they're vibrant, translucent, they float and move like real balloons and just like you were when you were a kid, you're captured by them and can't take your eyes off them for a second.

I've seen this film about five times so far, and I've teared up every single time. I've also shown this film to about six people and each of them have walked away loving it just as much as I do (its interesting to note that each of these people is from a different age group, ranging from teenagers to small kids to adults). To say it once again, all of these things show that this is a perfect, truly great film. I believe that this is the single greatest film I've seen all year, and deserves a spot in the various lists of the greatest movies of the decade. With the Academy Awards expanding their Best Picture category to 10, it is also possible that Up might get nominated, which would not only be well deserved, but would be a great win for all of animation in general. If you haven't seen this film yet, I can't suggest it more highly: you must see this film.

Avatar: A Movie Review!


So it's been awhile since I've done a movie review, but with the new year fast approaching (happy soon-to-be 2010 by the way) I thought that I should return to form and start spending my time in a dark, crowded movie theater sitting behind some crying kid, and wedged between two popcorn loving families that apparently have no sense of the word 'personal space' (or 'personal hygiene', if you want to get right down to it). Thus it is that I usher in the first of many movie reviews to come, in preparation to what I like to call the most wonderful time of the year: Awards Season! But enough of that, on with the review!

If you've seen a movie lately (lately meaning sometime within the last 20 year
s) then you've inevitably heard of James Cameron, director extroidinare with a career that shows for it: Terminator, Aliens, The Abyss, and most notably, Titanic are some of the many films that Cameron has made over the years, and has made them great, and when I say great I mean highest grossing film ever made great, 11 Oscar wins great. You know, that kind of great.

But in order to understand his latest success, Avatar, you have to go back a few years Cameron's Titanic days, when he announced in 1996, a year before Titanic hit theaters (see what I did there?) that he would begin working on a film tentatively titled Project 880 as soon as this whole Titanic business was over and done with. Hot on the heels of Titanic's splash with the movie-going world (the puns are too easy) , everyone was waiting in anticipation to see what else Cameron has up his multi- million dollar movie making sleeve. In 2006 though, he had to explain the delay of 880 was due to the fact that he was waiting for technology to catch up with his vision. Pretty ostentatious, but considering that this is the same man that built a camera specifically to be used in filming 3D and CGI movies, this only made
audiences more excited and interested in what was sure to be another ground breaking film that would provide an impressive notch in an otherwise amazingly well-notched belt.

And then the first trailer came out for Avatar (the name now changed from 880). Audiences were suddenly split in to two camps, those that thought the movie looked terrible, and those that were still excited to go and see it despite many of the complaints being toted by nay-sayers: the plot is basic and cliche! That CGI doesn't look all that impressive! Where's my groundbreaking CGI battle scenes between aliens and humans?! The Na'vi aliens don't look real at all! This looks like Dances with Wolves mixed with Smurfs! This is Dances with Smurfs! I want building excitement over the past 12 years back!

The list went on and on until it was time for Avatar to be unveiled to audiences
(after yet another delay, the movie was only just released in December as opposed to May to allow for more post-production editing, complex CGI work, and to allow more theaters to install 3D projectors to further give audiences the wow factor). And were they wowed! With an opening day total of 27 million, and a total of $642,993,860 wide so far, its well on its way to being just as successful as Titanic. But now for the actual critique:

When I went to go see Avatar, it was at Gallery Cinemas in Woodstock, which is not equipt with a 3D projector, so I saw Avatar in plain old 2D, and I can still say that it was mind blowing. I was one of those people who was skeptical after the first trailer, taking the story at face value and considering it un-original and done before, but trust me, you haven't seen it done like this before, you haven't seen anything done like this before.
Yes, the whole 'military and government are here to destroy some planet and its
people just for some rocks beneath the surface but oh yay, the bad guys turn around and become good guys to save the day' thing has been filmed before, but it hasn't been filmed by James Cameron, and that is what sets this movie apart from every other. Well that, and the ground breaking CGI work.

In the middle of the movie I had to stop and remember 'This is an entire world that was made from nothing Someone in a tiny studio spent weeks making that rock: giving it form, texture, making it interact with every other rock, plant, animal and being in this world in a realistic way' and the fact that there are millions of rocks, leaves, plants, animals, vines, etc in this film that look, act, and move realistically to the point that you thought they were real, is damn impressive to say the least.

And not only did you believe they were real, you felt for them. You were concerned for the Na'vi people, you felt their pain every time something horrible happened to the planet that they loved so much, every time a tree was crushed, a leaf burned, an animal killed, you wanted to cry along with them. This is the kind of emotional connection that some directors can't get audiences to feel with live action movies, sets and characters, let alone for an entire world built from a computer, and that in itself shows how amazing James Cameron is at doing what he does: he made audiences feel sorry for a bunch of computer generated aliens made from nothing but pixels and color, and feel a sense of unadulterated hatred for the bad guys, aka the real live actors portraying humans. That by itself deserves an award.

As for the rest of the movie, it was pretty good. The Na'vi people look realistic and their language, culture and world is unique and something that audiences enjoyed finding more about during the duration of the film. The main character, Jake Sulley, is likable, relatable, and everything else you want your main protagonist to be, while the bad guy general is every bit as rotten to the core as he needs to be: by the end of the movie, you hate him more than you've hated anything else that came from a movie, and when the moment finally comes for him to be overthrown, you'll want to cheer in your seat (and forget all about the cheesy dialouge this guy spouted throughout the whole film). The final battle is in a word, epic, and in 3D would look amazing between the explosions, aerial dog fights with machines and birds, and the heated struggle on ground level.

And while the story is a bit, well, cliche, you're not going into this thing for the story: you're going in to it wanting to be amazed, to see something that you've never seen before, to experience what James Cameron has been wanting you to experience since the 90's when he first envisioned a world that would capture your heart and imagination. And if you go into the film with these goals in mind, you will not be disappointed.

Apr 28, 2009

Just to let ya know..

Just thought that I should let all 3 of you who read this know:
I have another blog at http://idontknowwhoppers.blogspot.com/ which is mainly for school. BUT I update it more regularly and there are a ton more articles on everything from why College Freshman are lazy to Earth Hour, etc etc.
The excitement never stops!
So ch-ch-check it out and enjoy!
-Coffee Rock 

Mar 26, 2009

The Trouble with The Pope....


Okay so we all know the story by now: Pope Benedict XVI went to Africa, and told the thousands of people that went to go see him that 'condoms don't help stop the spread of HIV, on the contrary, they only worsen the problem.' I'm paraphrasing, but you get the point: the Pope flat out said that condoms make AIDS worse.


What the hell.


You don't have to be a scientist to know that this is a completely false statement: condoms do not, in fact, make the spread of AIDS worse. Out of all the studies done, there have been no findings to support this idea . Every scientist on earth can attest to the fact that condoms help to NOT spread AIDS. Hell, everyday people could tell you that condoms help prevent AIDS. But apparently, the Pope didn't get the memo.


Now I understand that the Catholic Church has been against any form of birth control from the get-go. It's just something that you don't do if you're Catholic. Period. Its a sacred rule that's been around for 2000 years, and its probably not going to change any time soon. Why? Because the Catholic Church is terrified of change of any kind. Their religion is built upon a set of rules that were made up a very, very, VERY long time ago, and even the idea of tweaking a few of those standards to fit a modern 21st century life style sends them into paralyzing fear. The Catholics are all for pro-creation, which is why 'every sperm is sacred' in their eyes, and everything from the pill to condoms is looked down upon.


Now like I said, I understand all of this. There is no question in my mind that pertains to why the Catholics don't like birth control, it's an easy enough concept to wrap your mind around. Put into math this means:

condoms + Catholics

= less Catholic babies

= less members of the Catholic Church

= less money going towards the Catholic Church

= you know what hits the fan (religiously speaking)

Now sure it's pretty cynical to assume that the only reason why the Church is against contraception is because they need a lot of church-goers come Sunday, but it's a realistic one: for the most part, young people aren't really into being Catholic. There are a lot of codes and conventions that limit them from doing the 'fun stuff' like pre-marital sex, etc. This being understood, the Church knows that if a Catholic couple have a baby, that baby is going to be raised Catholic, and will most likely stay with that religion until they have kids of their own, and those kids will be raised Catholic, and so on and so forth.


Sure it's practically immoral and most people aren't bright enough to pick up on this fact, and yes it's a complete ploy that has (possibly) kept the Catholic Church on top for the past few hundred years, but despite all this, this isn't what I have a problem with.


I have a problem with the fact that the Pope, a man who is considered divine and is looked up to by millions of people world wide, made a false statement, and never bothered to correct that statement. Furthermore, he specifically said this to thousands of people who currently live in a country that is being slowly destroyed by a terrible disease known as HIV. The only thing that is cheap, easy to attain, readily available and helps protect against this deadly disease are condoms, which are the exact thing that the Pope 'bashed' (for lack of a better word). Now, the millions of people who look up to him are questioning condom use, even though they do actually help protect against AIDS/HIV. And even though what he said is wrong and technically speaking he lied, no one is really allowed to say anything about it. Why? Because we are brought up in a religion-ridden society that considers it taboo and wrong to even think about questioning religion or what a religious leader says or does. Even though these people may be just as smart as us, we're not allowed to say a damn thing because we're just everyday citizens who although (for the most part) are educated, we're not the head of a religion. And religion is the one thing in society that you are not allowed to make fun of, question, or mock. Why? Because it's religionthat's why. This isn't right and it isn't fair, and because of this, the Pope gets off scott free without have to explain a thing. And that, my friends, is where I have a problem, and honestly, that's where I think you should have a problem too.

Mar 9, 2009

Who Watches the Watchmen? A Movie Review...


Ok, so this past weekend was huge for you if you are 
a) A comic book nerd
b) A movie nerd or 
c) A Literary nerd
Why is this you might ask? Because the greatest graphic novel of all time, winner of the Hugo Award, one of Time Magazines 100 Best Novels of the 21st Century, the 'un-filmable Graphic Novel' was in fact, filmed. It's called Watchmen and it came out in theaters this weekend. And for the most part, it was great. 

For those of you that don't know what Watchmen is about, here's the short version: Its a series of 12 comic books written by Alan Moore (who also wrote such famous titles as V for Vendetta and The League of Extraordinary Gentleman, and YES both of those were movies and are also graphic novels, betcha didn't know that one). Anyways, here's the whole wikipedia link, but to quickly sum it all up, here's the plot:
The year is 1985, an alternative reality. Nixon is president still (for his...5th term?). The Americans won the Vietnam War. Masked vigilantes (aka superheroes) were around since the 30's and on, but a law called The Keane Act has outlawed them. The Death Clock is set at 5 minutes to midnight, and the Russians and the Americans are close to nuclear war. Interested? I know I was.

The graphic novel really is astounding, showing that comic books aren't just for kids. Alan Moore did for graphic novels what Ralph Bakshi did for animation in the 70's: he took a medium that was under rated and thought by all to be 'for kids' and made it a real art form that could be intelligent, thought provoking, mature, etc. In other words,Watchmen changed the industry, and the way that everything was made from that point on.

So of course Hollywood wanted it. And bad. The rights to make Watchmen had been tossed around for years, with different studios and directors clawing each other for the opportunity to make it, but nothing came of this, especially when Terry Gilliam himself (famous director and former Monty Python member) deemed it 'un-filmable'.

The person that DID end up directing it was Zack Snyder, who has also done the comic book adaptation 300 (wow, ANOTHER comic book movie? Who knew?!) and the recent remake ofDawn of the Dead. Many were critical of Snyder, due to his slow mo, over saturated way of filming things, and while that did come out in Watchmen it did little to tarnish the film. But ANYWAYS on with the actual review!!

With a running time of an astounding 2 hours and 45 minutes (with more bonus material and deleted scenes to be included in the directors cut edition of the DVD!!) it was obvious that A LOT of time went in to filming this sucker, and it really does show: if you've read the graphic novel, the film looks likeWatchmen should. Though its apparent to veteran movie goers that most of it was filmed on a sound stage, they did a gorgeous job of using the right architecture, colors, etc to make it a visually appealing and comfortable film to look at. As for casting, it was pretty good (especially Jackie Earl Harvey as Rorschach), but my only problem is Matthew Goode as Adrien Veidt. For a guy who
a) rules the world (practically)
b) owns the world (again, practically) and can
c) throw 240 lbs guys all the way across the room...
he looked scrawny, and much too young. Seriously, he was frat boy material.

Also, they changed the ending. What. The. Hell. I knew this was coming, and I won't spoil either ending for those of you who haven't seen the movie OR read the novel, but I can tell you this: the graphic novels' ending is so much better. It makes more sense, it has more emotional impact, and its just plain BETTER. Trust me on this. Another thing that agitated me to no end was the fact that Snyder was bashing the audience over the head with the message of 'COMIC BOOK MOVIES AREN'T JUST FOR KIDS!! GET IT YET? NO?! MAYBE I SHOULD THROW IN MORE BLOOD AND MORE SEX SCENES!! THAT WILL SHOW YOU!!'
Really, Zack. It's okay. You can put down the fake blood and sit down now. We all understand, now please go off and just sit for a minute.

Other than those major complaints (which I could rant about for days) I didn't have any more issues with the movies. Sure, Dr.Manhattan is naked most of the time, sure the sex scene in the Owl Ship is the cheesiest thing to ever hit the big screen ( I laughed out loud, especially due to Leonard Cohen'sHallelujah playing in the background), and yes, some of the music as stated before was way, way WAY out of place. But I can forgive most of that.

Why? Mainly because of the fact that I liked it. I was never bored, I was entertained, the movie looked gorgeous, it was a great film, and an above average adaptation. But more over, this movie has shed so much light on the original graphic novel that millions of copies were being sold every day. This means that more people are going to take comic books seriously, and that this could be a big jump forward for the entire industry. 

To sum up, a 4.5/5 stars. I'll defiantly be buying the DVD (directors cut, extended version, etc). But please, if you want to see the movie, read the graphic novel too (ideally, read it first). This movie and the graphic novel deal with politics, morals, and complex ideas of society, human nature, and morality. Who watches the Watchmen? I do, and I'll continue to.

Jan 28, 2009

SAG Award Winners


Sorry that this is going up a bit late, guys. Please bear with me, but I just thought that its better late than never (right?) to announce the winners of the Screen Actors Guild Awards.

Best Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture
The Cast of  Slumdog Millionaire

Awesome. From what I hear from...well....EVERYBODY is that I MUST see this movie, or I won't be considered a fully operational human being. A film about a love story set in India winning? Also, very very cool.

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role
Sean Penn for his performance as Harvey Milk in Milk
Nice to see Penn win this, he's an extremely versatile actor. I mean come on, the dude started out as Spicoli the stoner, for christ sakes. Way to win, buddy. I love you. 

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role
Meryl Streep for her performance as Sister Aloysius Beauvier in Doubt

Yay. Really what else can I say? Way to go, Streep, but personally I wanted Hathaway to win here. Jeesh.

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role
Heath Ledger for his performance as The Joker in The Dark Knight

Awesome awesome awesome awesome. Really, I'm quite happy with this. While some might say that all of this means nothing because of Ledgers tragic passing, I disagree. It shows that the kind of performances and movies that can get recognized at these types of awards don't have to be the usual cookie cutter variety (aka indie, dramatic, etc

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role
Kate Winslet for her performance as Hannah Schmitz in The Reader

Great. Don't really have much to say here, because I think that Winslet should have won for Revolutionary Road instead.

Stay tuned for Academy Award coverage to come later!!


Jan 13, 2009

Glden Globes: The Aftermath


So the Golden Globes are done and over with: after parties have been cleaned up, hang overs cured and all the free food consumed by celebrities. BUT we don't care about that! Any self-respecting person only cares about how close I was with my predictions! Lets get it started, then. This will be set up like my previous article on who I thought will win, with the category followed by the winner.

Best Motion Picture, Drama
Slumdog Millionare
Well, I can't say that I didn't see this one coming. Everyone that's seen this movie highly recommends it and I'm happy that this little film (that wasn't going to be shown in America/North America at all) is getting the recognition it deserves. I can't say much personally for this film, seeing as how I have yet to actually watch it, but I'll be sure to sit down and enjoy it as soon as I can, hopefully before the Oscars come around. And as for this category, I was kind of right (I said either BB or Slumdog would win....hey, it still counts!)

Best Motion Picture, Musical or Comedy
Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Yes! I am happy to say that I got this one wrong: dead wrong. I assumed that Mamma Mia! would walk away the victor here, seeing as how...well, its MAMMA MIA! for christ sakes, it seems like everything that Abba music touches turns to gold (obviously not Golden Globe gold, though). Again, I haven't seen this film, but I've heard okay things about it: not great, not terrible. Well....at least In Bruge didn't win.

Best Actor, Motion Picture Drama
Mickey Rourke (The Wrestler)
Wrong AGAIN! Rourke owned this one, leaving the other incredible actors in the dust. But I do have to say, Leo DiCaprio was out of his league....but it doesn't make me want to watch Revolutionary Road any less. 

Best Actress, Motion Picture Drama
Kate Winslet (Revolutoionary Road)
The only thing better than Winslet winning (and me being right about this one) is her acceptance speech. A genuinely shocked Winslet accepted her award, flubbing on Angelina Jolie's name and almost shaking to death. This is why I like Winslet: she seems genuine. Jolie looked a little too smug on camera when her name was called during the 'and the nominee's are...' portion, but Kate seems very..human. Now if only I could say the same about our next winner.....

Best Actor, Motion Picture Musical or Comedy
Colin Ferrell (In Bruge)
Wait, WHAT?! That drunk  leprechaun of a human being won? As if it wasn't absurd that he won, his acceptance speech tops it. What is he talking about? Curiosity is love? Ignorance is nemesis? I'm not kidding, those are his actual words, check it out here. Sorry for the bad quality. Looks like someones been doing some coke with Mickey Rourke.......I'm sure if James Franco won, his stoned-up speech would've been more coherent and entertaining. 

Best Actress, Motion Picture Musical or Comedy
Sally Hawkins (Happy-Go-Lucky)
Again, not much to say here. Streep didn't win for Mamma Mia! (yay) but I was surprised that with VCBarcelona's win, that Rebecca Hall wouldn't walk away with the award here. Wrong again, I guess. 

Best Supporting Actor, Motion Picture
Heath Leder (The Dark Knight)
Two words: Hell. YES! I literally jumped out of my chair when Ledgers name was called and ran around the house yelling 'YES! Hell YES!'....until reality sunk in and I realized that he was dead, and although the win is a great achievement, its also a bit tragic. Christopher Nolans acceptance speech was good, and summed up that feeling. A few shots of the celebrity audience did show that it's obvious Heath will be missed........now if only (Dare I say it) the Oscar were to go to him also......

Best Supporting Actress, Motion Picture
Kate Winslet (The Reader)
Apparently, this is the first time in a major awards show that one person has won for best actress and best supporting.....so congratulations to Winslet, I really am happy for her. And I got this one right! Yes!

Best Animated Feature Film
Wall E
Oh, who called it? Yes, that's right, I did. But really, this one was all sewn up. And by the way...The Jonas Brothers? Really? You couldn't find anyone else to present the award so you dragged out the Disney duds? Way to go, Hollywood Foreign Press Association, way to go.

Best Foreign Language Film
Waltz with Bashir
Wow, this is an interesting choice. An animated documentary on war? Now that is good.

Best Director, Best Screenplay, Best Original Score
Slumdog Millionare
I'm just going to clump these all together because Slumdog took them all. Again, good going guys. I'm happy for the cast and crew.

Best Original Song
'The Wrestler' by Bruce Springsteen (from The Wrestler)
I was pretty sure that this one would win.....the Gabriel song was a long shot, and to be fair, this is a good song...classic, acoustic, blue collar Springsteen, but still good. After another listen or two, I've come to love it. Take a listen here, too.

So, those are the winners, folks. Some are expected, some are astounding (in the good and bad sense of the word). The Golden Globes is the first major award show of the year...and some have called it the Oscar Predictor......and sometimes, that's what it is. The difference between the GG's and the Academy Awards is that there are many, many, many more people that vote for who wins an Oscar than there are for who wins a GG....so its more unexpected and random. 

Hopefully, my boy Benjamin Button will come through a little more during the Academy Awards, seeing as how the film won nothing at this years GG's. No matter who wins though, its all about recognition: when you watch an awards show like this, you're introduced to films that you might not have heard of, or were interested in before the show. Afterwards, you might go out and rent that foreign film you heard so much buzz about, thus you are introduced to more cultures and you experience more films, and different films that what your used to. Its in this way that your mind is cinematically broadened, and you become a more well rounded person. So when the Academy Award Nominations come out on the 22nd (9 days from now)....you might want to write down a few titles, watch some movies, and experience some damn good cinema.















Jan 11, 2009

Golden Globe: Predictions


So I have to admit: I'm terrible at these award shows. No, I'm not talking about weather or not I win the heated debates over who had the nicest dress ( I frankly could care less about what garb the celebs have decided to drape over their delicate frames). I mean that I am terrible at guessing who will win what.
I'm torn between what I want to win, and what I honestly think will win. This year, I'm much more interested than I usually am, seeing as how I'm listened to and read MANY reviews of the films that are nominated this year, and even seen a few of them myself (Benjamin Button review, coming soon by the way). That being said, on with the predictions!

Best Motion Picture: Drama
Hmm, this is a hard one, but I'm pretty sure that either Benjamin Button or Slumdog Millionaire will take this one...I'm honestly surprised that Milk wasn't nominated and but in the race in this category, but meh, what can you do? I'd be surprised if Rev. Road or The Reader took this (sorry, Kate Winslet) and Frost/Nixon would be a good surprise.

Best Motion Picture, Musical or Comedy
I'm thinking that sadly, Mamma Mia! will steal this award......Abba and Streep? Its too powerful a concept to ignore. Personally though, I'd like to see Burn After Reading to get this one.

Best Actor, Motion Picture Drama
Leonardo DiCaprio (Revolutionary Road)
Frank Langella (Frost/Nixon)
Sean Penn (Milk)
Brad Pitt (Benjamin Button)
Mickey Rourke (The Wrestler)
So many good performances, so few awards....I hate to say it Leo, but I think you're out of your league here. I love you, I really do. But I'm pretty sure that the real race is between Langella, Penn, Pitt and Rourke.......possible win for Pitt? I hope so.

Best Actress, Motion Picture Drama
Anne Hathaway (Rachel Getting Married)
Angelina Jolie (Changeling)
Meryl Streep (Doubt)
Kristen Thomas (I've Loved You So Long)
Kate Winslet (Revolutionary Road)
My bet here is that either Streep or Winslet will win this one....Jolie isn't due for a GG yet, Hathaways film was too indie (although I would love to see her win) and to be honest, I've heard nothing about I've Loved You So Long.....so I doubt it will win.....

Best Actor, Motion Picture Musical or Comedy
Javier Bardem (Vicky Christina Barcelona)
Colin Farrell (In Bruges)
James Franco (Pineapple Express)
Brendan Gleeson (In Bruges)
Dustin Hoffman (Last Change Harvey)
Okay, I'll say this now: if either actor for In Bruge wins.....I don't even know what I'll do...but it will be drastic and un called for. My bet is for Hoffman....but my heart belongs to Franco....his performance made me laugh so hard I fell out of my chair and cried...'nuff said.

Best Actress, Musical or Comedy
Rebecca Hall (Vicky Cristina Barcelona)
Sally Hawkins (Happy-Go-Lucky)
Frances McDormand (Burn After Reading)
Meryl Streep (Mamma Mia!)
Emma Thompson (Last Chance Harvey
Basically none of the performances here are outstanding...and I don't really care about who wins this one.....but I'm going to assume that an un-deserved GG is going to Streep for this one....god, how I'm starting to hate musicals.....

Best Supporting Actor, Motion Picture
Tom Cruise (Tropic Thunder)
Robert Downey Jr. (Tropic Thunder)
Ralph Fiennes (The Dutchess)
Philip Seymour Hoffman (Doubt)
Heath Ledger (The Dark Knight)
This category is the one that has my knickers in a knot.......I'm hoping, no, PRAYING that Ledger wins this. He deserves it, he really honestly does. BUT I fear that Hoffman might steal this one......Downey Jr. would be my second hope for who wins...and seriously? Tom Cruise?! Who in the hell thought that his performance was honestly so amazing that he deserved an award? WHO?!

Best Supporting Actress, Motion Picture
Amy Adams (Doubt)
Penelope Cruz (Vicky Cristina Barcelona)
Viola Davis (Doubt)
Marisa Tomei (The Wrestler)
Kate Winslet (The Reader)
Ideally, Winslet will win this one ( I think that she put out two solid performances this year, and at least ONE of them should be recognized). Its possible that either Cruz or (less possibly) Tomei might take it, though.

Best Animated Feature Film
Wall E is going to win this, hands down. I will be extremly surprised if it doesn't....Pixar usually does, and lets face it: a cute dystopian movie with a lovable robot love story mixed in? Done deal, my friends, done deal. 

Best Foriegn Language Film
I hate to say it, but this year I have seen none of the films that are nominated in this category, and I apologize. I really can't say who I think will win this category...but a blind stab in the dark is I've Loved You So Long. But hey, what do I know?

Best Director, Motion Picture
Danny Boyle Slumdog Millionaire
Stephen Daldry The Reader
David Fincher Benjamin Button
Ron Howard Frost/Nixon
Sam Mendes Revolutionary Road 
Another tough one...but I'm thinking either Boyle, Howard or Fincher will win (in that order, Boyle being most likely, etc).

Best Screenplay, Motion Picture
Frost/Nixon
Benjamin Button
Doubt
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire 
Both Doubt and BB are adaptations....so although they could win, this award might be given to a more original work like Slumdog or Frost/Nixon.

Best Original Score
Benjamin Button (Alexandre Desplat)
Changeling (Clint Eastwood...wait, what!!!)
Defiance (James Newton Howard)
Slumdog Millionaire (A. R. Rahman)
Frost/Nixon (Hans Zimmer
I have no idea, who will win this!! I try really hard to try and remember the music and the ambience in a film as a result of that music, but I never can. But the big news here is omigodclinteastwood!! I honestly didn't know that he was that big of a composer. Thats pretty impressive......but for me, Hans Zimmer is the man (random fact: he and fellow nominee James Newton Howard composed The Dark Knight score together....speaking of which, why isn't TDK score nominated?! It was mind blowing).

Best Original Song
Down to Earth by Peter Gabriel and Thomas Newton (Wall E)
Gran Torino by Clint Eastwood, Jamie Cullum, Kyle Eastwood, Micheal Stevens (Gran Torino)
Once in a Lifetime by BeyoncĂ© Knowles, Amanda Ghost, Scott McFarmon, Ian Dench, James Dring and Jody Street (Cadillac Records)
This is the last category that I'm going to discuss, and, although its been said before, I'll say it again: This is a tough one. I love my man Gabriel, and hope he pulls through....but Springsteen is a good contendor, too. Oh, and god help us if the Cyrus song wins....just sayin'.


Well, that's that. No, I'm not going into the tv awards because I don't watch television and thus don't really care. The film awards are the only things that really matter to me, and tomorrow we'll see how right I was (don't hold your breath though, I'm usually wrong about these sorts of things). And remember, even if your favourite film/performance/song/score  doesn't win, there's always the barrage of other award shows coming up (DGA's, Oscar's, etc etc). And if you want, you can see the full, official list of categories and nominees here. Enjoy!

PS You'll notice that I've linked some of the nominees to individual trailers. Also, the nominees for Best Original Song are linked to youtube videos...most are amv's...sorry, its the best I could do, but I thought I'd do a little something extra for my fellow film fans.